Little Pleasures Little Treasures!

What better day to write about the pleasure in art than today, Miros birthday! Blessings to Google for bringing that to our attention!

I would like to point out this fervent belief that academics and intellectuals have in the present-day that pleasure in art somehow cheapens it, makes it like Disneyland or a Chocolate Box.
I dont agree with that belief, and am relieved to find I am not alone.
Fine art doesn't have to be for beating oneself over the back with, or for shoring up ones morality. That's what the Guardian is for!

Here's whatChristopher Butler says:

We worry a good deal about the moral and political significance of the arts. But this seems to me to be far too easy. Anyone can think up or obey political or moral principles and apply them to art, and many do. Such arguements are parasitic on those that we have all the time, and they often just use art to make familiar moral or political points which are usually believed in by the critic on grounds quite other than the examination or art. For example, if you know that patriarchy abuses women by displaying their bodies for the male's pleasure, then it can hardly come as a great surprise to be told that Titian's Venus of Urbino is somehow 'implicated' in the system and somehow bad. It is the fate of the pleasure the picture can give that interests me.

Some people are completely implacable when it comes to the idea of pleasure, believing like Protestants that any enjoyment must be evil, and that things should have a "higher purpose". But what higher purpose is there but pleasure? It elevates the person to a place outside themselves, neutering self-obsessiveness and neuroses, and enabling the viewer to become whole and truly oceanic, far more useful in the world than they would be if they were blindly (and lazily) bandwagonning!

QUANDO QUANDO QUANDO

Tell me when will you be mine Tell me quando, quando, quando We can share a love divine Please don´t make me wait again When will you say ´yes´ to me? Tell me quando, quando, quando You mean happiness to me Oh, my love, please tell me when Ev´ry moment´s a day Ev´ry day seems a lifetime Let me show you the way To a joy beyond compare I can´t wait a moment more Tell me quando, quando, quando Say it´s me that you adore And then, darlin´, tell me when (instrumental strings and brass) Ev´ry moment´s a day Ev´ry day seems a lifetime Let me show you the way To a joy beyond compare I can´t wait a moment more Tell me quando, quando, quando Say it´s me that you adore And then, darlin´, tell me when Oh, my darlin´, tell me when Mmm, my darlin´, tell me when

Sometimes a song says it best...
WHEN...?
Even though this song is about a man and a woman, it could also be the pleading of a human for a dream, any dream, to me its waiting for the moment when a connection can bring joy. Explain? Well, that's my ambition as an artist of course. I want to show people "the way to a joy beyond compare" - not much to ask is it? Compare and Contrast (as an old O-Level paper might demand) with contemporary artists..? I would like to console not control.

The dance that goes with this song, Quando Quando, I learned at a Horley Adult Education centre. Its like a Salsa, and one I found tricky but fun. I like (to) dance as it is challenging, disciplined, and takes you out of yourself - if you let it: if you dont become anxious about being clumsy and clodhopping! Ah to be graceful and fleet of foot, or at least think of myself that way. What's the saying "Dance Like No-One Is Watching!"? - yet an audience is important and sometimes the raison d'etre.. funny that.. I like to paint for an audience, but I dont like the idea of "performance"..

Tate Modern, Wednesday 5th April and Chelsea College of Art - with a sore back

This day was hard work. I am still aching.
I often feel overwhelmed when I go into a gallery, full of seeing and thinking, emotions and contextualising. Its even worse when the work is "busy". Sometimes art can be demanding just for the sake of being demanding. This was certainly the case with Kippenberger. I wish I had not seen it after Moholoy Nagy and the Bauhaus work, left it to another day or just not seen it at all. My role as an art-student means I have to expose myself to everything and load myself with more and more, but I am not a pack-horse. I can only carry so much on this journey, and the fact I have lived this life of mine for 36 years means I carry a lot more besides. I have to put something down to make room for something else, which is why I really need to only look at one artists output at a time. I felt like I was carrying just about enough with the first show, it felt like a well distributed load as well. Just about heavy enough. Maybe call me a lightweight, maybe say that those geometric works with all their inconsequential diagrammatic forms and colours are an insubstantial load, but they were enough for me. To then heap the innumerous products of an egomaniac drunkard on top of that was too much. The weight was then uneven, I found it physically hard to walk after that, and then my companion took me to Chelsea College of art where we found a crowd of MA students in forced gaiety mode cooking food on folding tables and drinking under a sea of sickly coloured crepe decorations, looking for all the world like one of those Brownie exercises that one is forced to do to celebrate the diversity of the world to earn badges, whilst surrounded by World Muzak. Exercises in futility, the last two events. Worthy? I dont know. They probably think so. They probably think they are making some bold new comment on society - oh, no of course not, nothing is EVER new in this "postmodern" era. But whatever it is they were doing, they weren't trying, they were too aware. In my opinion you have to hive yourself off - at least occiasionally - to really "try" an idea properly, before you "try" it on your contemporaries and an audience. Otherwise its just shouting in a riot - and thats what Kippenbergers paintings looked like - just a lot of shouting in an already loud world.

Dan and Jules and Mand

It is so refreshing to bring a lay-person to an art gallery and witness them having a great experience. Its important to me that people have a good experience when taking in something somebody has created. Of course, there cant be many artists who DONT want their viewer to have an experience, and indifference is worse than anything else - worse than misunderstanding, boredom or disappointment. Certainly one could not be indifferent towards the plasticised cadavers of Bodyworks, pickled sharks, unborn lambs or a monumental quadraplegic. But I am probably different to my contemporaries in that I wish people a pleasing and contemplative experience, or if an unpleasant one - one that deals with sensual reflexes rather than cognitive ones. It was with this in mind that I took my partner to the Dan Flavin Retrospective. He is the barometer for me of what is important. OK it might not be that grand a scheme to make art that is so simple and acessible, and I may get accused of appealing to the lowest common denominator, but to be honest, I didn't see that many Sun readers at the exhibition!




untitled (to you, Heiner, with admiration and affection), 1973

I took some voice notes when I went around the exhibition. This was the first work on show (no. 1 on the plan), and the eerie green light beckoned seductively through the door. There was a strong sense of curiousity that drove me towards entering this space, as I'm sure it must have been for other visitors. The coloured glow that eminates from behind the ticket-check is mysterious and enticing. We were drawn in like moths to a flame.

I noted while walking around this green barrier that people who stood near it seemed to have a pink halo around them. Their body edge must have contrasted so much with the florescent green that the eye created this magenta aura as a kind of differentiation between the light/dark and area/form. I am always contantly amazed by what the eye and brain can conjure out of any given situation, and when I got to the bookshop I went mad buying a heap of books about colour and perception!
















When I got to the Icons (no.2 ) I noted that I had no idea what Masonite was! I noted I was struck by the red and yellow tubes combined together - this was my favourite piece out of this group, although I really did like the tubes over the painted coloured squares. I thought they were very interesting. Pity I didn't explain why at the time. If only I'd had a pencil and paper!









Monument 4 (piece no.6) I was very intruiged by too. My voice notes dont really explain this very eloquently "Looks like a Red Crossbow. Its arranged so that the top light only reflects off the ceiling: when you look at the reflection on the floor it just looks like an arrowhead pointing to the corner - which is quite an interesting use of reflection and the trick of the eye: what the eye sees and what the eye doesn't see. Also the fact that people are walking around casting shadows everywhere makes quite an interesting spectacle."
Sounds like something a 16 year old chav would emit doesn't it! Unfortunately I had to record something, I didn't have my sketch book, I was in somewhat of a hurry because I was not on my own, and the staff there do not like you having a mobile phone - so I was having to mutter into it rather surreptitiously!




Athough I am not as well-read as Flavin I am familiar with Tatlin's theoretical tower - and the ideas and drawings of it in various guises and by various artists did actually inform my work last year when I built a tower of clay sticks. For some reason I am reminded of Gaudi's Sagrada Familia when I look at the Tatlin tower in its original sketched state. Maybe its because of the curves and holes contained in this eccentric twisted structure soaring up to the clouds.














Voice Note 5: 'In the "Institute Of The Arts" Room you come across a work called "To Janie Lee 2" - its like magic - the colours that hit the wall are completely different colours that appear to be the fluorescent lights - and.. it IS almost like magic.'

Voice Note 6: 'With the Helen Winkler 1972* work the cool white and the warm white fluorescent lights 8 foot square its hard to appreciate the work because it instantly calls to mind office spaces - especially with the "warm white" fluorescent lights which seem to be ubiquitous."
I felt guilty making such ugly and blind/bland associations - bringing my sad and empty baggage to the spectacle - but alas sometimes you cannot help but pollute the sublimely beautiful with the mundane...


*Haven't found any reference to a work of this name since the show but I did have a brief look at Helen Winkler and her association to Dan Flavin.
A nice article on Dia...
http://www.gradewinner.com/p/articles/mi_m1285/is_6_33/ai_103672331/pg_2?pi=gdw